This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

Deputy Director of the CEBM, GP and clinical lecturer at the University of Oxford.

Cardiology trainee and clinical research fellow at the University of Oxford

See Carl Heneghan in action in the CEBM's workshop videos.
Click here
Coronary heart disease (CHD), which usually presents as a heart attack (or myocardial infarction, MI) is the most common cause of death and disability both in the UK and globally. The way in which CHD is treated and prevented therefore has huge implications for patients, health professionals and policymakers. Once a person has a heart attack, prevention of further heart attacks, stroke or death, or secondary prevention, is crucial. There is strong evidence for benefit of several drugs and treatments after heart attacks to this end, including aspirin, statins, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) causes more mortality and morbidity than any other disease in both rich countries and poor countries [1]. The risk factors have been well-known for 50 years, but the optimal prevention strategy is still elusive.
Primary prevention treats individuals before they have a heart attack, whereas secondary prevention focuses on individuals who have had a heart attack. Several classes of drugs treat cardiovascular risk factors, demonstrating benefits in both primary and secondary prevention [2]. Many of these drugs are off-patent, and therefore cheap. Six years ago, Wald and Law hypothesised that a “Polypill”, containing three anti-hypertensives, folic acid, simvastatin and aspirin, could reduce the rates of CVD by over 80%, if all adults over the age of 55 years took it [3]. This week the Lancet published the first ever trial of such a Polypill [4, 5].
Recent comments
3 weeks 13 hours ago
6 weeks 1 day ago
6 weeks 1 day ago
6 weeks 1 day ago
6 weeks 4 days ago
6 weeks 6 days ago
7 weeks 2 days ago
7 weeks 2 days ago
8 weeks 6 days ago
8 weeks 6 days ago